Dark
Light
Today: June 16, 2024
January 31, 2024
1 min read

Cracking the Code: Unveiling the Secrets to 2023’s Series A Success

The VC bubble has subsided and last year marked one of the most difficult on record to raise a Series A funding round. As interest rates climbed and global uncertainty became pervasive, the growth-at-all-cost mindset evaporated and investors pivoted rapidly to favoring startups with strong revenue, capital efficiency and strong gross margins. This left a lot of companies in the wind with 2023 seeing the highest number of startup bankruptcies in a decade.

At Kruze Consulting, we work with more than 800 startups and their founders to help them navigate everything from bookkeeping to getting prepared for funding rounds and due diligence. At the end of the year, I wanted to find out what separated seed-funded startups that were able to raise a Series A with their peers that folded in 2023. The analysis that I’m about to present looks at data from about 100 seed-funded startups that tried to raise a Series A in 2023 — comparing those that were successful with those that failed and subsequently went under.

Revenue growth is, as always, a prominent signal. All of the companies that managed to raise were growing revenue on average at 4x the rate of those that closed shop. However, there were many startups with impressive revenue growth that were still unable to raise a Series A.

To that end, gross margin on that revenue was another clear distinction between companies that raised and those that failed. About 90% of startups raising a Series A in 2023 had an over 50% gross margin, with the average of the successful companies being 80%. Again, the growth-at-all-cost mindset went by the wayside as investors only deployed capital into businesses that were generating high-margin revenue growth.

And those strong unit economics at the top line flowed through to the bottom line as well, with companies that closed a Series A showcasing an average burn multiple of just over 3x, whereas companies that failed were 10x worse. Only founders who had capital efficiency at the forefront were able to close that next round.

The past year was full of hard-earned lessons for founders and reset the standards for venture-backed startups. It all happened very quickly, and many businesses that didn’t have these metrics at the foundation of the business from the beginning were not able to turn the battleship in time.

Key points:

  • The growth-at-all-cost mindset evaporated in 2023 as investors favored startups with strong revenue, capital efficiency, and strong gross margins.
  • Startups that raised a Series A had an average revenue growth rate 4x higher than those that failed to raise.
  • About 90% of successful startups raising a Series A had a gross margin over 50%, with an average of 80%.
  • Companies that closed a Series A had an average burn multiple of just over 3x, while failed companies were 10x worse.
Previous Story

$38 Million Funding Boost for Breakthroughs: Freya Biosciences Secures CE-Ventures’ Support

Next Story

Nordic Heights: Unleashing Giant Ventures in the Nordic Region

Latest from Blog

Go toTop